Policy highlights:

  • In this article, the Institute of Public Health Bangalore (IPH) presents a case study based on a short-term advocacy campaign in India. The campaign successfully challenged sponsorship and support by a government agency for an event organized by the global tobacco industry. The IPH coordinated nationwide collaborative multi-channel advocacy effort. Combining different and complementary advocacy campaigns with diverse groups of stakeholders (with different perspectives) was crucial in achieving success.


  • The effect of an advocacy campaign is dependent on the context and the traits specific to the problem being addressed. For example, in this case: 1) it was not easy for the general public to relate to an issue of sponsorship-led tobacco promotion by the tobacco industry, 2) IPH observed that emerging competition among regional television news channels provided an opportunity to secure media slots (the context can also be used as a strategic advantage), and 3) due to conflicting mandates, maintaining a cordial partnership with the government was challenging.
  • More generally, the programme showed that: 1) With administrative and political advocacy actions, government agencies should be involved from the beginning and throughout, as it increases the understanding of government departments’ conflicting mandates and actors’ strategic potential. 2) When using media advocacy, framing the issue, timing, targeting, factual information, linking journalists with potential commentators/experts, and fostering individual relationships are important. 3) In legal advocacy campaigns, the use of a court directive can support both immediate outcomes and long-term policy change, and provide a clear judicial interpretation of the issue. Continuous interactions and close partnerships with lawyers to expand and exchange knowledge are useful, while combining different strategies can help shape the legal arguments and evidence. 4) Mobilizing NGOs and community groups strengthens advocacy efforts and provides continuity (one of the organizations continued to initiate public enquiries). Framing the issue in different ways appeals to diverse NGOs. Finally, even targeted and limited community engagement is crucial in projecting the issue as a concern for general public, rather than specific groups.
Connected themes
Share this post

Related items

INCLUDE 2021 Conference report Building forward more inclusively-cover
INCLUDE conference report: ‘Building forward more inclusively’

We are proud to share the newly released conference report, from INCLUDE’s online event ‘Building…

Closing session social card
Building forward more inclusively: looking ahead for Africa’s recovery post-COVID-19

Read about the most important recommendations that emerged during the wrap up of the INCLUDE conference ‘Building forward more inclusively’ on 16 June 2021.

Getting up to speed with inclusive development

One of INCLUDE’s core beliefs is that so much knowledge already exists, it just needs guiding to the right places and the right people in order to reach its full impact for policy and, ultimately, for development.

Two INCLUDE-related projects awarded additional grants to continue work on inclusive development

NWO-WOTRO Science for Global Development has awarded 22 projects within the WOTRO Impact and Innovation Grants (I&IG) that build on previously funded NWO-WOTRO projects. Two of these projects are led by researchers from former INCLUDE programmes.

Africa Day: Beyond the Celebration

On 25th May each year, Africa Day is commemorated diversely in the continent and the diaspora. I would like to share some thoughts about what I believe must be an important day of reflection and re-commitment in our continent.