Policy highlights:

  • Savings groups are often argued to be a ‘livelihoods game changer’, promoting financial inclusion, good savings behaviour and asset accumulation, as well as helping young people to start or expand entrepreneurial and other income-generating activities (only 4.2 million of the 800 million young people living on less than US$2 per day globally have access to financial services).
  • However, savings group programmes have produced mixed and inconclusive results. To find out more, this study interviewed 57 members of a youth savings group combined with a training programme in Tanzania, Zambia, Uganda, and Kenya on their use of loans and share pay-outs.
  •  With only modest investment, the creation or expansion of small-scale income-generating activities (characterized by low barriers to entry, low skills and low investment) tends to increase competition for resources and income. In the study, there were only a few examples of investment in skills, capital goods, and technology upgrading. Hence, it appears that savings groups do not produce productive entrepreneurship outcomes.
  • Policymakers should approach savings groups in such contexts differently, not expecting an (immediate) revolution in local economic activities, but still recognizing their added value: 1) savings groups can sustain levels of economic activity and income generation, 2) the real benefits of membership may lie in learning, behavioural change, building social capital and accumulating assets (the implication is that these programmes may need to be evaluated over a 5–10 year timespan) and, finally, 3) savings groups can solidify young people’s social networks, allowing them to cope with situations of economic precarity.
  • Finally, policymakers should recognize that ‘youth’ is a diverse category and not a homogenous group. They should be approached as such.
Connected themes
Share this post

Related items

Note 2: Ap(p)iculture: Compatibility mode for digitalisation?

In this blog, the authors present an analysis of the digital divide in Uganda, where the digital transition is still unequally distributed and user experiences vary greatly depending on the infrastructures available.

+2
By Ester Agasha (PhD) +2 more
youth at work 2 pager
Youth @ Work: 5 pathways for change

How to address the African missing job crisis through green and digital jobs, while assuring that none is left behind? INCLUDE's recently published evidence synthesis paper series provides a number of potential solutions: they were discussed in the webinar series Youth@Work, from which we present five key insights.

Maya Turolla Profile
AERC Regional Policy Forum summary

The AERC hosted a virtual Regional Policy Forum on 28 March 2022. The forum brought together key stakeholders who play important roles in shaping new research findings, paving new policy directions, and initiating innovative practices in the areas of youth and employment.

beehive-article-image
Hive-minded: what’s working for inclusion in apiculture?

This blog presents a concrete example of inclusion in practice, embodied by the Inclusion officer at The Uganda National Apiculture Development Organisation (TUNADO), a member-based national apex organisation for apiculture in Uganda.

+3
By Caspar Swinkels +3 more
cairo-workers
Identifying Economic Sectors to Create Employment for Youth in Africa: key findings from selected country cases

Growth Sectors for Youth Employment (GSYE) is an African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) collaborative research…

John_maara_Photo_