Batik seller in traditional market. Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Project: JRF. Photo: Nugroho Nurdikiawan Sunjoyo / World Bank

Creating more and better jobs is central to our work at the World Bank and a shared goal for virtually all countries —developed and developing alike. But oftentimes the policy debate turns to the cost and effectiveness of programs and projects in creating jobs.

As an example, I recently found myself in the middle of a discussion regarding a development project aimed at creating employment:  one of the reviewers objected given that the cost per job created was too high. “More than $20,000 per job,” he said, comparing it to much lower numbers (between $500 and $3,000 per job) usually associated with active labor market programs such as training, job search assistance, wage subsidies, or public works.

But what is the rationale behind these numbers?

Contrary to an active labor market program (ALMP), which connects workers to existing jobs, or to public works that create low productivity jobs with earnings below the minimum wage, the project in question was promoting private investments to create new jobs in the formal sector.

Creating new jobs is not cheap

People tend to associate the cost of a job with the salaries and benefits paid to a worker. But for that worker to be able to do something useful, he needs to have the equipment and presumably a place where to operate. The business hiring the worker most likely will have to buy insurance and pay for different types of permits, plus basic services such as water and electricity. At the margin, adding a new job costs probably “only” the salary, a desk, and a computer. But for that job to be created, a new enterprise had to be established in the first place, with associated capital and operational expenditures.

Take the case of a coffee-shop in the United States. According to Crimson Cup Coffee, setting up a coffee shop with seating can cost between $80,000 and $250,000. Costs include rent, reserves for salaries and benefits, fees for architects and lawyers, equipment, raw materials, income taxes, and others. A coffee shop usually employs between three and seven people, meaning each job would cost between $25,000 and $35,000.

How many jobs can $10 million create? 

For a couple of countries, my colleague Mohamed Marouani – an Economist and Associate Professor at the University of Sorbonne– and I have used general equilibrium models to estimate the number of jobs that could be created in different sectors of the economy given a $10 million investment.

We were initially surprised: the numbers are not that large — just a couple hundred direct jobs.

For instance, In Tunisia, by investing $10 million, you could create 300 jobs in sectors like trade, wood, or construction, but less than a hundred in the electrical or the transportation sector (see chart). That is, again, about $30,000 per job. These numbers can double if you count the indirect jobs — those created due to the increased demand for inputs, goods, and services when a specific sector grows. But the indirect jobs require investments of their own, so cost per-job does not change much.


Number of direct and indirect jobs created following a US$10 million sectoral investment.

The fundamental question for policymakers trying to employ more people: how do I use limited public resources?

Do I allocate them towards active labor market programs, or do I use them to promote the creation of new businesses or the expansion of existing businesses?

The answer, of course, will depend on the nature of the problem. In a vibrant economy that is creating enough jobs and where the issue is merely to reduce frictional unemployment by helping job-seekers to connect to jobs, a government could be satisfied by supporting cheaper — well designed — active labor market programs. But when the problem is structural, when there are not enough jobs, at least not enough quality jobs, the government might not have another choice but to stimulate investments and job creation. Usually, this would involve boosting aggregate demand or investments targeting specific  sectors.

Therefore, cost per job may not be the right indicator in measuring job creation policies but rather the social rate of return associated with the intervention.

In a future post, we will discuss how to calculate this rate of return (and take into account social externalities of job creation) based on our note on cost-benefit analysis of jobs investment projects.

This expert contribution was originally published by David Robalino on the website of The World Bank’s Jobs and Development Blog.
Connected themes
Share this post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related items

Green jobs & the future of work in Africa: the story of Olivia Onyemaobi and Pad-Up Creations

In this video, we present the story of Olivia Onyemaobi, Nigerian entrepreneur and founder of Pad-Up Creations, a social enterprise producing affordable and eco-friendly sanitary pads in partnership with CFYE.

Digital Skills for Youth Employment in Africa

Digitalisation and technological advancements are changing the world of work and the skills needed for employment. In Sub-Saharan Africa alone an estimated 230 million jobs will require digital skills within the next decade offering employment opportunities for its ever growing youth population. However, young people in Africa face several barriers that prevent them to obtain the types of skills required for employment. The evidence synthesis paper published by INCLUDE explores the challenges and opportunities of this digital transformation and presents recommendations of how to equip Africa’s youth for the future of work.

By Ruth van de Velde +3 more
A decent proposal: self-employment for women in Uganda

This blog is part of a case study that examined decent work in the context of the work lives of self-employed and rural women in central Uganda in collaboration with 100WEEKS, a cash transfer graduation programme.

Six key insights for green jobs for youth in Africa

The African green transition has the potential to create a plurality of job opportunities that help tackle the negative consequences of climate change: green jobs. To find out what is needed to facilitate green jobs for young people in Africa, INCLUDE and Palladium engaged in a collaborative research project in the context of the Challenge Fund for Youth Employment.

Siri profile picture
youth at work 2 pager
Youth @ Work: 5 pathways for change

How to address the African missing job crisis through green and digital jobs, while assuring that none is left behind? INCLUDE's recently published evidence synthesis paper series provides a number of potential solutions: they were discussed in the webinar series Youth@Work, from which we present five key insights.

Maya Turolla Profile