Policy highlights:

  • Women are often targeted in cash-transfer programmes because they are believed to invest more in household well-being, education and health than men.
  • A systematic review of 15 studies shows that targeting women in cash-transfer programmes does not guarantee positive outcomes. However, it can contribute to the well-being of children, especially when it comes to investing in their health and education.
  • There seems to be a difference in effect for different types of programmes. Conditional cash-transfer programmes show a clear positive relationship between gender and household well-being. This relationship is much more ambiguous for unconditional cash transfers, such as pension schemes and microcredit.
  • These findings indicate that it is important to take gender into consideration when designing cash-transfer schemes.

Related items

AERC Regional Policy Forum summary

The AERC hosted a virtual Regional Policy Forum on 28 March 2022. The forum brought together key stakeholders who play important roles in shaping new research findings, paving new policy directions, and initiating innovative practices in the areas of youth and employment.

Getting up to speed with inclusive development

The INCLUDE team’s reading list: March 2022 Every month we share with our readers a…

Getting up to speed with inclusive development

The INCLUDE team’s reading list: February 2022

reading-list-include-dec-2021
Getting up to speed with inclusive development

Every month we share with our readers a curated reading list on inclusive development. Here you can find the list for December 2021

reading-list-november-cover
Getting up to speed with inclusive development

Every month we share with our readers a curated reading list on inclusive development. Here you can find the list for November 2021