Policy highlights:

  • This report reviews the expectations held by different partners in the ‘Dialogue and Dissent: Strategic Partnerships for Lobby and Advocacy’ policy programme implemented by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) between 2016 and 2020. The programme aims to strengthen civil society organizations in low- and lower-middle-income countries in their role as advocates and lobbyists by establishing equal and mutually-beneficial partnerships between state- and non-state actors in a structured framework (as opposed to sporadic engagement based on, for example the alignment of agendas at a certain point in time).
  • In the programme, differences of opinion are not only accepted, but welcomed, for the energy generated by friction, which can contribute to achieving change. Developing approaches for dealing with dissent in a productive way may help mitigate concerns among Ministry staff, for whom dissent may sometimes appear risky. The Dutch MFA aims to create new opportunities for acting together and, defining and achieving goals in equal and reciprocal relations with space for flexibility. Risks are taken together and partners can hold each other accountable.
  • The main challenges to the partnerships include: 1) coordination, capacity, implementation and sustainability, for example, what partners can expect from each other should be collaboratively defined (e.g. whether strategic or capacity-related value is most important), 2) determining what counts as an ‘effective’ partnership and how to evaluate this, 3) autonomy, which is a complex issue as NGOs can be associated with government partners (and the other way around) or governments may propose adjustments to NGO programmes; questions should be raised about the space and quality of connections available to local partners and, finally, 4) expectations for collaboration and added value, which are predominantly rooted in the perceived alignment of agendas and approaches.
  • Another issue is how to manage friction and how to make it productive. Suggested methods include: 1) keeping each other informed in a timely fashion so that partners can prepare to respond, 2) facilitating dialogue to overcome friction, and, in particular, 3) creating distance, while maintaining good partner relations and communication.
Connected themes
Share this post

Related items

INCLUDE 2021 Conference report Building forward more inclusively-cover
INCLUDE conference report: ‘Building forward more inclusively’

We are proud to share the newly released conference report, from INCLUDE’s online event ‘Building…

Closing session social card
Building forward more inclusively: looking ahead for Africa’s recovery post-COVID-19

Read about the most important recommendations that emerged during the wrap up of the INCLUDE conference ‘Building forward more inclusively’ on 16 June 2021.

Getting up to speed with inclusive development

One of INCLUDE’s core beliefs is that so much knowledge already exists, it just needs guiding to the right places and the right people in order to reach its full impact for policy and, ultimately, for development.

Two INCLUDE-related projects awarded additional grants to continue work on inclusive development

NWO-WOTRO Science for Global Development has awarded 22 projects within the WOTRO Impact and Innovation Grants (I&IG) that build on previously funded NWO-WOTRO projects. Two of these projects are led by researchers from former INCLUDE programmes.

Africa Day: Beyond the Celebration

On 25th May each year, Africa Day is commemorated diversely in the continent and the diaspora. I would like to share some thoughts about what I believe must be an important day of reflection and re-commitment in our continent.